> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Hans Verkuil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 06 February 2008 08:24:07 Levente NovАk wrote: > > > This is something I do not quite understand: why is the temporal > > > filter set initially to 8, since this produces ghosting and jerky > > > movement most of the time? Setting it to 0 (or to 1-4) produces far > > > better results for me, but judging from the freevo as well as other > > > mailing lists most people do likewise. > > > > This value was copied from the Windows driver and I've never seen > > problems with it (at least not with PAL), provided you capture at full > > resolution (720x480/576). If you capture at less than the full > > resolution, then the temporal filter should be set to 0. Some older > > kernels did not do this which led to ghosting, but anything after > > 2.6.20 or so should work well. > > > > I saw ghosting on my PVR-350 (NTSC) in kernel 2.6.23, even capturing > at 720x480. So some cards still need to have the temporal filter > manually set to 0 through v4l2-ctl.
is there any console or graphic application (except v4l-ctl) for more comfortable tuning of hardware filters ? Igor _______________________________________________ ivtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users
