On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Wes Hardaker wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:49:51 -0400 (EDT), Tree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > T> I'm also running LVM... interesting. Even this *can't* be unique, though, > T> can it?? > > There are many that believe LVM for myth is a bad thing because it adds > just one more delay to writing to the disk. That being said, most LVM > timings I've seen are such a small drop that I can't imagine that being > the problem. There are huge numbers of LVM discussions in the various > mythtv lists and forums.
Well, I'd give up on myth (really ivtv...) before LVM. I use LVM extensively and wouldn't consider managing a box without it. It's not only "the right way to do it" it's "the only way to do it". And the "it" here isn't myth, it's filesystems. IMHO, of course. -Tree _______________________________________________ ivtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users
