Andy Walls wrote: > 2. It's been a long time (too long) since I worked anywhere with an > oscilliscope available to me. :( So I would be fumbling in the dark > as well. > > (Coincidentially, I just happen to be updating my resume right now. > It looks like about 1998 when I last used an oscilliscope at work.)
Things have certainly changed considerably since then, such as: http://www.elandigitalsystems.com/measurement/usbscope50.php which (on the above page) has downloadable software for both Linux and that other OS. It's stated that the freely-available software operates in demo mode if no device is detected, so that might work well for evaluation purposes. It would be better if they plainly stated the real-time sampling rate though, instead of the equivalent-time. Your experience with the historical intrumentation places you in a superior position to those who only know the modern stuff (IMHO), but I've found that it helps to spell résumé correctly. <g> Skydiver compliments are always back-handed. These ancient VHS tapes I'm working with, for instance, have one instructor who looks the same now as he did 25+ years ago. When I announced that fact at the dropzone, I waited a second or so and then added "... he's *always* looked old!" _______________________________________________ ivtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users
