It was the talk of a quick interim release that sent me down that path.
On 11/13/06, Stephane Bailliez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eric Crahen wrote: > You're going to do an offical release where all you have done is changed > package names? Why not just bump the version, leave it in cvs as a > development branch and keep it there until significant effort and testing > has been done. I don't think anyone said that. In addition there was: "- code refactorings aimed at code cleaning and better design, easing new developers involvment " And leaving things in cvs means as well that no one will use it too. 'significant effort and testing' is empirical as well. Of course if we release things that constantly break previous version, it's no fun. Chicken and egg problem. -- stephane
-- - Eric
