Bob, If you want to make offline build, you can have a look to http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ivy-user/200612.mbox/raw/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]/ (Thread 'Disconnected Development' of 21 and 22 December on the ivy-user list)
Regards, Gilles > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Buck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: mercredi 2 mai 2007 0:50 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Flexible cache management (Was Re: [ANN] Ivy 2.0.0-alpha-1) > > > Great! Thank you for considering this folks. > > I would guess you understand the need. For us, to integrate IVY at > VeriSign > there are several steps in the process, which also involves security, and > usability. The key factor with developer usability is the capability to > work > disconnected; we are VERY geographically distributed, with developers > working from Bangalore, Mountain View, Toronto, Boston, and Vienna. The > new > cache management scheme will make working remotely (from the Boston > office) > easy as pie. > > I have done some fields trials with an entirely new build system that > leverages IVY. Build times were dramatically reduced, in some cases by > 10x. > Module Ant files were dramatically simplified as well. The new build > system > is in a holding pattern until this feature becomes available. > > Thanks, looking forward to the feature, and working with IVY. > > --Bob > > > Xavier Hanin wrote: > > > > On 4/26/07, Eric Crahen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> This is also a real show stopper at my company. > >> > >> I've been encouraging people to consider ivy, but lack of this feature > >> turns > >> people off in a big way. Its the biggest blocker to adoption for me. > > Thanks for reminding that to us, Eric. I know how much this feature is > > important for you, and for many other people, according to the number > > of votes. We will definitely consider this issue with very attention > > in the next future. > > > > Xavier > > > >> > >> On 4/26/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > >> > On 4/26/07, Buck, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > Will IVY-399 be in 2.0? The reason I ask is because this is a show > >> > > stopper issue for use of IVY at VeriSign. > >> > This is something that is not decided yet, but this issue has the > >> > highest number of votes, and is definitely in Ivy's spirit of > >> > flexibility, so I'd say that the probability is very high to see it > in > >> > 2.0 final. > >> > > >> > Xavier > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> - Eric > >> > > > > > > -- > > Learn Ivy at ApacheCon: http://www.eu.apachecon.com/ > > Manage your dependencies with Ivy! > > http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/ > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Flexible-cache- > management-%28Was-Re%3A--ANN--Ivy-2.0.0-alpha-1%29- > tf3652025.html#a10277391 > Sent from the ivy-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
