Thanks Gilles. Let me get things pulled together on my end; to make meaningful use of IVY with the feature, I need to work with our security teams to set up secure proxies in our Dulles datacenter, set up a jboss cluster on our build servers (for IVY), etc.
Cheers, Bob Gilles Scokart wrote: > > Bob, > > If you want to make offline build, you can have a look to > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ivy-user/200612.mbox/raw/ > [EMAIL PROTECTED]/ > (Thread 'Disconnected Development' of 21 and 22 December on the ivy-user > list) > > Regards, > Gilles > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bob Buck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: mercredi 2 mai 2007 0:50 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Flexible cache management (Was Re: [ANN] Ivy 2.0.0-alpha-1) >> >> >> Great! Thank you for considering this folks. >> >> I would guess you understand the need. For us, to integrate IVY at >> VeriSign >> there are several steps in the process, which also involves security, and >> usability. The key factor with developer usability is the capability to >> work >> disconnected; we are VERY geographically distributed, with developers >> working from Bangalore, Mountain View, Toronto, Boston, and Vienna. The >> new >> cache management scheme will make working remotely (from the Boston >> office) >> easy as pie. >> >> I have done some fields trials with an entirely new build system that >> leverages IVY. Build times were dramatically reduced, in some cases by >> 10x. >> Module Ant files were dramatically simplified as well. The new build >> system >> is in a holding pattern until this feature becomes available. >> >> Thanks, looking forward to the feature, and working with IVY. >> >> --Bob >> >> >> Xavier Hanin wrote: >> > >> > On 4/26/07, Eric Crahen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> This is also a real show stopper at my company. >> >> >> >> I've been encouraging people to consider ivy, but lack of this feature >> >> turns >> >> people off in a big way. Its the biggest blocker to adoption for me. >> > Thanks for reminding that to us, Eric. I know how much this feature is >> > important for you, and for many other people, according to the number >> > of votes. We will definitely consider this issue with very attention >> > in the next future. >> > >> > Xavier >> > >> >> >> >> On 4/26/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > On 4/26/07, Buck, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > Will IVY-399 be in 2.0? The reason I ask is because this is a show >> >> > > stopper issue for use of IVY at VeriSign. >> >> > This is something that is not decided yet, but this issue has the >> >> > highest number of votes, and is definitely in Ivy's spirit of >> >> > flexibility, so I'd say that the probability is very high to see it >> in >> >> > 2.0 final. >> >> > >> >> > Xavier >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> - Eric >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Learn Ivy at ApacheCon: http://www.eu.apachecon.com/ >> > Manage your dependencies with Ivy! >> > http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/ >> > >> > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Flexible-cache- >> management-%28Was-Re%3A--ANN--Ivy-2.0.0-alpha-1%29- >> tf3652025.html#a10277391 >> Sent from the ivy-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Flexible-cache-management-%28Was-Re%3A--ANN--Ivy-2.0.0-alpha-1%29-tf3652025.html#a10283843 Sent from the ivy-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
