Obama points finger at tech companies for disinformation in major speech
by Rebecca Klar - 04/21/22 5:33 PM ET
https://thehill.com/policy/technology/3382803-obama-points-finger-at-tech-companies-for-disinformation-in-major-speech/

Former President Obama placed blame on tech companies for failing to address 
the disinformation problem he said the industry has amplified during a speech 
Thursday at Stanford University.

The new information ecosystem, fueled by the rise of dominant social media 
platforms, is “turbocharging some of humanity’s worst impulses,” he said in the 
roughly hourlong speech.

“But not all problems we’re seeing now are an inevitable byproduct of this new 
technology. They’re also the result of very specific choices, made by the 
companies that have come to dominate the internet generally, and social media 
platforms in particular. Decisions that intentionally or not have made 
democracies more vulnerable,” he said.

Certain features, such as the “veil of anonymity” online, have compounded the 
problem, he said.

Obama highlighted the real-world impacts of the spread of disinformation, 
discussing the spread of false information about the COVID-19 pandemic and 
vaccines, 2020 election conspiracies that fueled the violent riot at the 
Capitol last year and Russian disinformation campaigns leading up to the 
invasion of Ukraine.

“People like [Russian President Vladimir] Putin, and Steve Bannon for that 
matter, understand it’s not necessary for people to believe this information in 
order to weaken democratic institutions. You just have to flood a country’s 
public square with enough raw sewage. You just have to raise enough questions, 
spread enough dirt, plant enough conspiracy theorizing, that citizens no longer 
know what to believe,” Obama said. Bannon is a former strategist for former 
President Trump.

“Once they lose trust in their leaders, mainstream media, in political 
institutions, in each other, the possibility of truth — the game’s won,” he 
added.

Obama has in recent months taken a more active role in the public conversation 
around mitigating disinformation. Earlier this month, he spoke on the topic at 
a conference organized by the University of Chicago and The Atlantic.

On Thursday, the former president advocated for a multipronged approach to 
combat disinformation — including from government reform, tech employee-led 
change and a shift in the way users consume news and information online.

“At the end of the day the internet is a tool, social media is a tool. At the 
end of the day tools don’t control us. We control them. And we can remake 
them,” Obama said.

“It’s up to each of us to decide what we value and then use the tools we’ve 
been given to advance those values. And I believe we should use every tool at 
our disposal to secure our greatest gift —a government of, by and for the 
people, for generations to come,” he said.

Without going into specific detail, Obama offered support to plans to reform 
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which gives tech companies a 
legal liability shield from content posted by third parties. The controversial 
measure has been attacked by lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, though there 
is little bipartisan consensus on how to reform it.

But he said the issue must also be addressed within the industry.

“These companies need to have some other North star other than just making 
money and increasing market share. Fix the problem that in part they helped 
create, but also to stand for something bigger,” he said.

“And to the employees of these companies and to the students here at Stanford 
who might well be future employees of these companies: You have the power to 
move things in the right direction. You can advocate for change, you can be 
part of this redesign — and if not, you can vote with your feet and go and work 
with companies that are trying to do the right thing,” he added.
Equilibrium/Sustainability — The downside of displaying road fatality numbers
More than 20 states ask court to block Title 42 rescission

In addition to changes on the “supply” side, there needs to be a shift within 
the “demand,” he said.

That change starts with “breaking through our information bubbles,” he said.

“I understand that there are a whole bunch of people in this country who have 
views diametrically opposed to mine. I promise they tell me all the time. I get 
it. I’m not suggesting that all of us have to spend our days reading opinions 
we disagree with or looking for media stories that fundamentally don’t share 
our values. But it is possible to broaden our perspectives,” he said.

-- 
Iw mailing list
[email protected]
http://sticklist.org/mailman/listinfo/iw_sticklist.org

Reply via email to