[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESJ-1169?page=all ]
     
Michael Glavassevich resolved XERCESJ-1169:
-------------------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

I've just committed a fix to SVN. You should be able to verify it with 
tomorrow's GUMP build [1] of Xerces.

[1] http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public-jars/xml-xerces2/jars/

> With XMLGrammarCachingConfiguration, some Text nodes are completely missing 
> from the DOM.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: XERCESJ-1169
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESJ-1169
>      Project: Xerces2-J
>         Type: Bug

>     Versions: 2.8.0
>  Environment: Java-1.4.2_09, Eclipse_3.2RC7, JUnit, tests parsing complex 
> document with embedded XML DSIG using namespaces.
>     Reporter: Tom Oehser
>     Assignee: Michael Glavassevich
>  Attachments: reproduceXercesGrammarCachingBug.zip
>
> I am parsing a document which has an XML DSIG signature, when I turn on 
> System.setProperty( "org.apache.xerces.xni.parser.XMLParserConfiguration",    
>          "org.apache.xerces.parsers.XMLGrammarCachingConfiguration"); 
> sometimes (I think the first time is fine, the second time and higher it 
> fails) the "SignatureValue" Element node has child Text node.  Parsing 
> without the Caching configuration is find, there is always a Text node under 
> the SignatureValue Element node.  Parsing with the CachingConfiguration, the 
> first time it has a Text child node, the next time and thereafter, there is 
> no child of the SignatureValue node at all.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to