[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESJ-1169?page=all ]

Michael Glavassevich updated XERCESJ-1169:
------------------------------------------

      Component/s: DOM (Level 3 Core)
    Fix Version/s: 2.8.1

> With XMLGrammarCachingConfiguration, some Text nodes are completely missing 
> from the DOM.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: XERCESJ-1169
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESJ-1169
>             Project: Xerces2-J
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: DOM (Level 3 Core)
>    Affects Versions: 2.8.0
>         Environment: Java-1.4.2_09, Eclipse_3.2RC7, JUnit, tests parsing 
> complex document with embedded XML DSIG using namespaces.
>            Reporter: Tom Oehser
>         Assigned To: Michael Glavassevich
>             Fix For: 2.8.1
>
>         Attachments: reproduceXercesGrammarCachingBug.zip
>
>
> I am parsing a document which has an XML DSIG signature, when I turn on 
> System.setProperty( "org.apache.xerces.xni.parser.XMLParserConfiguration",    
>          "org.apache.xerces.parsers.XMLGrammarCachingConfiguration"); 
> sometimes (I think the first time is fine, the second time and higher it 
> fails) the "SignatureValue" Element node has child Text node.  Parsing 
> without the Caching configuration is find, there is always a Text node under 
> the SignatureValue Element node.  Parsing with the CachingConfiguration, the 
> first time it has a Text child node, the next time and thereafter, there is 
> no child of the SignatureValue node at all.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to