Thanks, Khaled for your response. Since the Xerces team has already raised the grammar issue with the XML Schema WG, so I won't raise this issue with them.
Thanks for other information also regarding the facets. I'll appreciate if you could please share any more information regarding these issues in future. Hoping to get your comments regarding my patch in near future ... Meanwhile, I am continuing to work further on assertions support, and understand other areas of Xerces code as well. On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Khaled Noaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Mukul, > > There is a problem with the grammar for <restrintion> of <simpleContent>. > The way it is defined there is no way to differentiate between the 2 assert > elements (the one in the facets and the one that follows the wildcards since > everything in between is optional). We have raised the issue to the W3C > working group. > > You can have multiple facet definitions. However, with the exception of > pattern and enumeration (will wait for a clarification on assert), you can > only have one definition for a given facet (i.e. no multiple 'minLength' > facets definitions in the same restriction element). > > > Khaled -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
