Hi Hiranya, Thanks for your reply. Pls see some of my comments, below. On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Hiranya Jayathilaka <[email protected]> wrote: > You are correct. I started revising my patch against the specs but never > finished it due to a bunch of other commitments.
no problems! We all get busy some or the other time. > However what I learnt > during the little time I spent on this was that my patch to implement > xs:override covers most (if not all) of the requirements stated in the > specs. That's great. When I looked at your patch some time ago, I felt it had implemented a good framework for xs:override. Though, we need to check the patch you submitted, for finer points as well. But it's a good starting point, and we must start from there. > That's great. However I would like if you can first take the patch I have > submitted and start from where I've left instead of beginning from the > scratch. It's a pretty simple code so I'm sure you can get hold of the logic > implemented there easily. Yes, definitely. I am going to start from your patch for this implementation, and would discuss on the list, in case we face implementation difficulty. > Also now that the GSoC is over and some of the other Apache releases I've > been working on in the past few weeks are coming to an end I'll have some > time to actually devote to this in the weeks to come. So I can help you with > revising the patches and refining the design/implementation. That's great. I'll try to submit something about xs:override in coming days (as discussed, with an extension from your patch), and then we can progress from there. > +1 Thanks! -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
