Hi Yin, (Responding to you about this privately.)
It was just recently brought to my attention that your proposal has a number of similarities to the one which Ishan submitted on March 9th to the mailing list. I did compare your proposal to Ishan's and did indeed find that it contains some sentences that are identical to ones in his proposal and others that appear to have been edited with details specific to yours. I also see Ishan's name in the meta-data of the HTML files you've been posting so it would seem that you used his as a starting point. I would very much encourage you to rewrite any sections that you may have borrowed in your own words. Students are being judged on their original work and are expected to submit proposals which reflect that. Thanks. Michael Glavassevich XML Parser Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] "xiaohei.leiyin" <[email protected]> wrote on 03/29/2010 10:21:40 AM: > Hi Michael, > > Today i edit my proposal again and got a new version, i will submit > it in the GSoC web site soon. Now, i sent it to you first, if you > have any advises or suggestions, just let me know, thank you. I hope > i can finshed this project well,do some thing, or even do more thing > for Xerces :-) > > > 2010-03-29 > > xiaohei.leiyin > > 发件人： Michael Glavassevich > 发送时间： 2010-03-29 11:51:01 > 收件人： [email protected] > 抄送： > 主题： Re: GSoC proposal about "Asynchronous LSParser and parseWithContext " > Hi Yin, > > Yin Lei <[email protected]> wrote on 03/25/2010 04:53:16 AM: > > > Hi Michael, > > > > About the function parseWithContext(LSInput input, Node > > contextArg,short action), there is a point i am not so clear. > > > > If LSInput contains following content: > > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > > <element id="1">element_one</element> > > <element id="2">element_two</element> > > > > For a LSInput, is it well-format or legal ? Or we could just neglect > > XML declation ? > > It matches the production [1] for well-formed external parsed > entities so I would say yes it's allowed. That's a text declaration > [2] by the way, not an XML declaration. > > > If this input is legal,action is ACTION_INSERT_AFTER and contextArg > > is a DOM element has the following content: > > > > <contextnode>content here</contextnode> > > > > Should we return this DOM Node ? > > > > <contextnode>content here</contextnode> > > <element id="1">element_one</element> > > <element id="2">element_two</element> > > As long as the parent of "contextnode" is an Element or a > DocumentFragment that is the correct result. > > > Thank you and expceting your reply > > Thanks. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816/#NT-extParsedEnt > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816/#NT-TextDecl > > Michael Glavassevich > XML Parser Development > IBM Toronto Lab > E-mail: [email protected] > E-mail: [email protected] [attachment "Xerces.htm" deleted by > Michael Glavassevich/Toronto/IBM] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
