Argh... wrong reply-to address. Didn't intend to bring this out into the open, but it is now.
Michael Glavassevich XML Parser Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote on 03/29/2010 11:00:43 AM: > Hi Yin, > > (Responding to you about this privately.) > > It was just recently brought to my attention that your proposal has > a number of similarities to the one which Ishan submitted on March > 9th to the mailing list. I did compare your proposal to Ishan's and > did indeed find that it contains some sentences that are identical > to ones in his proposal and others that appear to have been edited > with details specific to yours. I also see Ishan's name in the meta- > data of the HTML files you've been posting so it would seem that you > used his as a starting point. > > I would very much encourage you to rewrite any sections that you may > have borrowed in your own words. Students are being judged on their > original work and are expected to submit proposals which reflect that. > > Thanks. > > Michael Glavassevich > XML Parser Development > IBM Toronto Lab > E-mail: [email protected] > E-mail: [email protected] > > "xiaohei.leiyin" <[email protected]> wrote on 03/29/2010 10:21:40 AM: > > > Hi Michael, > > > > Today i edit my proposal again and got a new version, i will submit > > it in the GSoC web site soon. Now, i sent it to you first, if you > > have any advises or suggestions, just let me know, thank you. I hope > > i can finshed this project well,do some thing, or even do more thing > > for Xerces :-) > > > > > > 2010-03-29 > > > > xiaohei.leiyin > > > > 发件人： Michael Glavassevich > > 发送时间： 2010-03-29 11:51:01 > > 收件人： [email protected] > > 抄送： > > 主题： Re: GSoC proposal about "Asynchronous LSParser and parseWithContext " > > Hi Yin, > > > > Yin Lei <[email protected]> wrote on 03/25/2010 04:53:16 AM: > > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > > > About the function parseWithContext(LSInput input, Node > > > contextArg,short action), there is a point i am not so clear. > > > > > > If LSInput contains following content: > > > > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > > > <element id="1">element_one</element> > > > <element id="2">element_two</element> > > > > > > For a LSInput, is it well-format or legal ? Or we could just neglect > > > XML declation ? > > > > It matches the production [1] for well-formed external parsed > > entities so I would say yes it's allowed. That's a text declaration > > [2] by the way, not an XML declaration. > > > > > If this input is legal,action is ACTION_INSERT_AFTER and contextArg > > > is a DOM element has the following content: > > > > > > <contextnode>content here</contextnode> > > > > > > Should we return this DOM Node ? > > > > > > <contextnode>content here</contextnode> > > > <element id="1">element_one</element> > > > <element id="2">element_two</element> > > > > As long as the parent of "contextnode" is an Element or a > > DocumentFragment that is the correct result. > > > > > Thank you and expceting your reply > > > > Thanks. > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816/#NT-extParsedEnt > > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816/#NT-TextDecl > > > > Michael Glavassevich > > XML Parser Development > > IBM Toronto Lab > > E-mail: [email protected] > > E-mail: [email protected] [attachment "Xerces.htm" deleted by > > Michael Glavassevich/Toronto/IBM] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
