+1
Christophe
Le 2017-06-06 01:40, Gary Gregory a écrit :
Java 9 won't even compile for Java 5 (which is EOL and not under
support from Oracle, not sure about IBM). I think dropping Java 1.3 is
perfectly OK.
Gary
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Jan Tosovsky <j.tosov...@email.cz>
wrote:
On 2017-04-20 Mukul Gandhi wrote:
Xerces-J 2.12.0 would comprise of two Xerces-J releases:
One release will be from the trunk ... and its XML Schema
component
will be at 1.0 level. This release would run on JDK 1.3 min.
Another release ... will provide support for XML Schema 1.1.
This release would run on JDK 1.4 min.
It sounds like artificial splitting just to keep support for Java
1.3...
From end-user point of view I would be confused when browsing maven
repository. I would have to find some documentation and investigate
the
purpose of each version...
Java 1.3? In my POV the support for EOLed versions of (any) software
is
beneficial only for attackers as they have easier way to compromise
the
target system.
Switching to more recent Java version could help in fixing issues
like this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESJ-1598 [1]
Jan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-dev-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: j-dev-h...@xerces.apache.org
Links:
------
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESJ-1598
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-dev-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: j-dev-h...@xerces.apache.org
