Assuming it's just minor bug fixes, 2.12.1 sounds about right. Thanks.
Michael Glavassevich XML Technologies and WAS Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: mrgla...@ca.ibm.com E-mail: mrgla...@apache.org Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote on 2019-12-10 09:51:47 AM: > I'm all for it. Since our current release is 2.12.0, it seems to me > the next release should be 2.12.1 or 2.13.0, not 2.15.0. Skipping > versions will just confuse users IMO. > > Gary > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 7:11 AM Mukul Gandhi <muk...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all, > I've been thinking that, whether we should make a new release of > Xerces2-J or not in near future. > > I think that, to decide about this, we should know how many Jira > issues we've fixed since our previous release (2.12.0). I've > produced following Jira report (as of today), depicting this: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ConfigureReport.jspa? > projectOrFilterId=project-10520&periodName=quarterly&daysprevious=589&cumulative=false&versionLabels=all&selectedProjectId=10520&reportKey=com.atlassian.jira.jira- > core-reports-plugin%3Acreatedvsresolved-report&atl_token=A5KQ-2QAV- > T4JA-FDED_fee8ee71d4783bd1c62bd857be93bd1af71bb7f1_lout&Next=Next > > The above report, shows for each quarter since our previous release, > how we've responded to reported jira issues (created vs resolved). > Please also look at, the 'Data Table' mentioned at bottom of above > referred report (that points to individual Jira issues). > > I've a feeling that, we could make a new Xerces2-J release (my > suggested new version number is, 2.15.0. any thoughts?) with the > improvements as are reflected within above mentioned Jira report. > The issues fixed are not too many since our 2.12.0 release, but the > new Xerces2-J release could still be valuable to community. > > Any thoughts from devs, shall be helpful to Xerces project. > > -- > Regards, > Mukul Gandhi