Assuming it's just minor bug fixes, 2.12.1 sounds about right.

Thanks.

Michael Glavassevich
XML Technologies and WAS Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: mrgla...@ca.ibm.com
E-mail: mrgla...@apache.org

Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote on 2019-12-10 09:51:47 AM:

> I'm all for it. Since our current release is 2.12.0, it seems to me 
> the next release should be 2.12.1 or 2.13.0, not 2.15.0. Skipping 
> versions will just confuse users IMO.
> 
> Gary
> 
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 7:11 AM Mukul Gandhi <muk...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>    I've been thinking that, whether we should make a new release of 
> Xerces2-J or not in near future.
> 
> I think that, to decide about this, we should know how many Jira 
> issues we've fixed since our previous release (2.12.0). I've 
> produced following Jira report (as of today), depicting this:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ConfigureReport.jspa?
> 
projectOrFilterId=project-10520&periodName=quarterly&daysprevious=589&cumulative=false&versionLabels=all&selectedProjectId=10520&reportKey=com.atlassian.jira.jira-
> core-reports-plugin%3Acreatedvsresolved-report&atl_token=A5KQ-2QAV-
> T4JA-FDED_fee8ee71d4783bd1c62bd857be93bd1af71bb7f1_lout&Next=Next
> 
> The above report, shows for each quarter since our previous release,
> how we've responded to reported jira issues (created vs resolved). 
> Please also look at, the 'Data Table' mentioned at bottom of above 
> referred report (that points to individual Jira issues).
> 
> I've a feeling that, we could make a new Xerces2-J release (my 
> suggested new version number is, 2.15.0. any thoughts?) with the 
> improvements as are reflected within above mentioned Jira report. 
> The issues fixed are not too many since our 2.12.0 release, but the 
> new Xerces2-J release could still be valuable to community.
> 
> Any thoughts from devs, shall be helpful to Xerces project.
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Mukul Gandhi

Reply via email to