Hi Mukul, You are (or anyone who would volunteer is) always free to do that. Without your initiative it's quite possible that the previous release (2.12.0) might still be stalled today.
Thanks again for moving things forward. Michael Glavassevich XML Technologies and WAS Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: mrgla...@ca.ibm.com E-mail: mrgla...@apache.org Mukul Gandhi <muk...@apache.org> wrote on 2019-12-10 11:23:48 PM: > Hi Michael (& Gary), > Thanks for your thoughts. > > I too find that, 2.12.1 looks to be the right version number for > Xerces2-J's new release. > > I'll be happy to devote my time over next few days (or may be few > small weeks), to make new Xerces release. Can you please give your > go ahead for starting the process of making a new Xerces release? > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 9:52 PM Michael Glavassevich <mrgla...@ca.ibm.com > > wrote: > Assuming it's just minor bug fixes, 2.12.1 sounds about right. > > Thanks. > > Michael Glavassevich > XML Technologies and WAS Development > IBM Toronto Lab > E-mail: mrgla...@ca.ibm.com > E-mail: mrgla...@apache.org > > Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote on 2019-12-10 09:51:47 AM: > > > I'm all for it. Since our current release is 2.12.0, it seems to me > > the next release should be 2.12.1 or 2.13.0, not 2.15.0. Skipping > > versions will just confuse users IMO. > > > > Gary > > > > -- > Regards, > Mukul Gandhi
