That is correct. It was not implemented. My own concerns about compatibility aside, we weren't sure Xerces could support XML 1.0 fifth edition while also being compliant to JAXP. I suppose we could have implemented it as part of a non-default configuration but who would turn it on? Someone who really wants this could choose to write an XML 1.1 document instead.
-----Original Message----- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elh...@ibiblio.org> Sent: January 22, 2023 6:35 PM To: j-dev@xerces.apache.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] XML 1.0 Fifth Edition name rules in Xerces I wanted to check on the current status of XML 1.0 Fifth edition name rules in Xerces2 for Java. (The retcon where the W3C imported the XML 1.1 name rules and declared they had always meant something completely different than and incompatible with the BNF grammar in the first through fourth editions.) I don't see anything about this in Jira or the release notes, and in my simple test it looks like these changes are not implemented, at least not in the DTDConfiguration. Is that correct? -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elh...@ibiblio.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-dev-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: j-dev-h...@xerces.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-dev-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: j-dev-h...@xerces.apache.org
