[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESJ-1766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Samael Bate updated XERCESJ-1766:
---------------------------------
    Description: 
there are 2 github repos for Xerces:
 * [https://github.com/apache/xerces-j/]
 * [https://github.com/apache/xerces2-j/]

the xerces-j repo appears to be much more up to date than the xerces2-j one 
despite the fact that the xerces-j repo seems to be where most people are 
making pull requests.

Neither provide a clear indication of the reason for having two repositories or 
which one is considered active. 

Looking at the history of each I can see that up until April 2019 they seem to 
have the same changes:

[https://github.com/apache/xerces-j/commits/main]

[https://github.com/apache/xerces2-j/commits/trunk/]

although the commit hash's differ:

!image-2024-09-24-00-58-33-645.png|width=1029,height=408!

 

If it is the case that [https://github.com/apache/xerces-j/] is the correct 
repo to use then please make the other one read-only with a note to let users 
know. It's confusing and could be wasting peoples time if they are making PR's 
to a dead repo. There are currently 10 pull requests on the 
[https://github.com/apache/xerces2-j/pulls] repo, perhaps they need rebasing 
onto xerces-j.

 

also, please consider merging [https://github.com/apache/xerces-j/pull/1] as I 
have another branch that I want to make a pull request for but would like to at 
least have some CI in place first.

  was:
there are 2 github repos for Xerces:
 * [https://github.com/apache/xerces-j/]
 * [https://github.com/apache/xerces2-j/]

the xerces-j repo appears to be much more up to date than the xerces2-j one 
despite the fact that the xerces-j repo seems to be where most people are 
making pull requests.

Neither provide a clear indication of the reason for having two repositories or 
which one is considered active. 

Looking at the history of each I can see that up until April 2019 they seem to 
have the same changes:

[https://github.com/apache/xerces-j/commits/main]

[https://github.com/apache/xerces2-j/commits/trunk/]

although the commit hash's differ:

!image-2024-09-24-00-58-33-645.png!

 

If it is the case that [https://github.com/apache/xerces-j/] is the correct 
repo to use then please make the other one read-only with a note to let users 
know. It's confusing and could be wasting peoples time if they are making PR's 
to a dead repo. There are currently 10 pull requests on the 
[https://github.com/apache/xerces2-j/pulls] repo, perhaps they need rebasing 
onto xerces-j.

 

also, please consider merging [https://github.com/apache/xerces-j/pull/1] as I 
have another branch that I want to make a pull request for but would like to at 
least have some CI in place first.


> please clearly mark which github repo is correct
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: XERCESJ-1766
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESJ-1766
>             Project: Xerces2-J
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Samael Bate
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: image-2024-09-24-00-58-33-645.png
>
>
> there are 2 github repos for Xerces:
>  * [https://github.com/apache/xerces-j/]
>  * [https://github.com/apache/xerces2-j/]
> the xerces-j repo appears to be much more up to date than the xerces2-j one 
> despite the fact that the xerces-j repo seems to be where most people are 
> making pull requests.
> Neither provide a clear indication of the reason for having two repositories 
> or which one is considered active. 
> Looking at the history of each I can see that up until April 2019 they seem 
> to have the same changes:
> [https://github.com/apache/xerces-j/commits/main]
> [https://github.com/apache/xerces2-j/commits/trunk/]
> although the commit hash's differ:
> !image-2024-09-24-00-58-33-645.png|width=1029,height=408!
>  
> If it is the case that [https://github.com/apache/xerces-j/] is the correct 
> repo to use then please make the other one read-only with a note to let users 
> know. It's confusing and could be wasting peoples time if they are making 
> PR's to a dead repo. There are currently 10 pull requests on the 
> [https://github.com/apache/xerces2-j/pulls] repo, perhaps they need rebasing 
> onto xerces-j.
>  
> also, please consider merging [https://github.com/apache/xerces-j/pull/1] as 
> I have another branch that I want to make a pull request for but would like 
> to at least have some CI in place first.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-dev-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: j-dev-h...@xerces.apache.org

Reply via email to