Hi Martin,
Thanks.
On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 11:06 PM Martin Honnen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> One other essential thing missing is in my view is support for
> xsl:next-match
Hoping that, Xalan's XSLT 3 implementation may have, implementation of
xsl:next-instruction in the future.
> In general, next to running samples from the test suite, I think it
> might be worth by now to check how far your XSLT 3.0 branch works when
> run against existing real life XSLT 2 or XSLT 3 code, Schxslt 1 and
> Schxslt 2 being just one (but certainly important) example.
IMHO, I don't consider, Xalan's XSLT 3 implementation as *mine*. It
significantly reuses Xalan-J's XSLT 1.0 implementation.
> All meant as constructive input; congrats on the wide range of XPath 2
> and 3.1 functions and XSLT 3.0 declarations and instructions you have
> implemented so far.
I've very much enjoyed learning XSLT 3 and XPath 3.1 languages, during
Xalan's XSLT 3 implementation phase.
I'm taking little liberty, to copy this mail to Scott Boag, if he's
any comments on Xalan's XSLT 3.0 development work. Xalan's XSLT 3.0
latest code is located here,
https://github.com/apache/xalan-java/tree/xalan-j_xslt3.0_mvn.
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
