Thomas Scheffler <thomas.scheff...@uni-jena.de> wrote on 07/20/2011
09:47:53 AM:

> Am 20.07.2011 15:24, schrieb Michael Glavassevich:
> >
> > Thomas,
> >
> > Not sure if there's a better way to fix XERCESJ-809, but agree that
> > what was done is trading one problem for another.
> >
> > If you're stuck, you could always build Xerces from source, reversing
> > the patch for XERCESJ-809.
> >
>
> Yeah this is open source. I could do that. But I definitively like to
> see that fixed upstream. So maybe the best is to file a bug on that
issue.

Sure, feel free to open a JIRA issue.

> Thank you for pointing me to the report.
>
> regards,
>
> Thomas

Thanks.

Michael Glavassevich
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: mrgla...@ca.ibm.com
E-mail: mrgla...@apache.org

Reply via email to