Hi Thomas,
One vote from me too solve this. It breaks down my compatibilty too.
Dick Deneer
Op 21-jul-2011, om 16:03 heeft Thomas Scheffler het volgende geschreven:
Am 20.07.2011 15:53, schrieb Michael Glavassevich:
Thomas Scheffler <thomas.scheff...@uni-jena.de> wrote on 07/20/2011
09:47:53 AM:
> Am 20.07.2011 15:24, schrieb Michael Glavassevich:
> >
> > Thomas,
> >
> > Not sure if there's a better way to fix XERCESJ-809, but
agree that
> > what was done is trading one problem for another.
> >
> > If you're stuck, you could always build Xerces from source,
reversing
> > the patch for XERCESJ-809.
> >
>
> Yeah this is open source. I could do that. But I definitively
like to
> see that fixed upstream. So maybe the best is to file a bug on
that
issue.
Sure, feel free to open a JIRA issue.
For the records:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESJ-1519
regards,
Thomas Scheffler
--
Thomas Scheffler
Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Thüringer Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek
Bibliotheksplatz 2
07743 Jena
Phone: ++49 3641 940027
FAX: ++49 3641 940022
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-users-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: j-users-h...@xerces.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-users-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: j-users-h...@xerces.apache.org
