+1. Thanks Mukul.

Michael Glavassevich
XML Technologies and WAS Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: mrgla...@ca.ibm.com
E-mail: mrgla...@apache.org

Mukul Gandhi <muk...@apache.org> wrote on 04/23/2018 08:06:24 AM:

> From: Mukul Gandhi <muk...@apache.org>
> To: j-...@xerces.apache.org, priv...@xerces.apache.org, j-
> us...@xerces.apache.org
> Date: 04/23/2018 08:08 AM
> Subject: Re: [REVISED VOTE]: Xerces-J 2.12.0 release
> 
> Hi all,
>    The 1st voting for Xerces-J 2.12.0 release was stopped, due to 
> certain issues that were in the release candidates (RC) that were 
> found by the reviewers ([5]). Those have been fixed now, and I'm 
> initiating this new mail for the Vote for new RC.
> 
> I've uploaded Xerces-J 2.12.0 release candidates (the revised one) 
> to [1] for review. In this release candidate there are two sets of 
> packages, the main release built from the trunk [2] and the XML 
> Schema 1.1 release built from the XML Schema 1.1 development branch 
> [3]. The change summary is available here [4] in JIRA. 81 issues 
> (plus issues that were mentioned, during the review of 1st RC) were 
resolved.
> 
> Test results have been looking good, so I'd like to call an official
> vote now on the release.
> 
> To start, here's my +1.
> 
> Great work everyone.
> 
> [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/xerces/j/2.12.0/
> Revision 26468
> 
> [2] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xerces/java/tags/Xerces-J_2_12_0/
> Directory revision: 1829687 (of 1829689)
> 
> [3] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xerces/java/tags/Xerces-J_2_12_0-
> xml-schema-1.1/
> Directory revision: 1829688 (of 1829689)
> 
> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> projectId=10520&version=12336542
> 
> [5] https://markmail.org/message/54obpdyqrn6nfzgi : discussion about
> previous RC, suggesting a revote
> 
> [6] Deleting .md5 hash files from the RC distribution at, https://
> dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/xerces/j/2.12.0/. Mentioned Revision 
> number in point [1] above. (suggestions from sebb, seb...@gmail.com 
> during this voting)
> 
>  
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Mukul Gandhi

Reply via email to