Tomasz Sterna <[email protected]> writes: > W dniu 23.05.2016, pon o godzinie 15∶38 -0400, użytkownik Greg Troxel > napisał: >> Does this imply that it should be safe, aside from cautions in NEWS, >> to update a machine running 2.3.x to 2.4.0? > > Yes. No breaking changes. > >> Often a minor version change indicates something more dramatic than >> bugfixes, so I thought I would ask. > > I am attempting to follow http://semver.org/ so every release should > bring up MINOR number, with PATCH reserved for fixing screw-ups in > MINOR release. > > 2.4.0 fixes bugs in XMPP/XEP/daemons implementation, not in the release > process itself. > > So, expect 2.5.0 to follow up, not 2.4.1.
Thanks. That's a change in versioning policy, but makes sense. I tend to update the pkgsrc entry, and wanted to get a sense of how cautious I should be since other people, absent effort, get whatever udpates I commit.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
