On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Michael Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Arthur Blake wrote: > > Any comments on this, or shall I just check it in? > > I was thinking about checking it in for 1.3 branch (creating one if > > necessary) and the trunk both... > > It looks good to me. I wouldn't bother with a branch for 1.3 - this is a > bug fix, the code change is small and all the tests pass. > I think a branch *is* necessary since the trunk has changed quite a lot since 1.3... otherwise how else would I do it? I don't want to modify the 1.3 tag directly! (would not we always do it this way after the main release has been done, no matter how trivial the change??) > > > Also, do you think we ought to get a build out for this fix right away? > > Not sure how important this is- given that the bug has been in there > > for over a year, and this is the first time someone found it! > > Ya, I think we should make a 1.3.1 but no major hurry. This weekend > perhaps? > OK then, if everyone is fine with it, I'll take care of it as soon as I can-- probably before the weekend.
_______________________________________________ Jabsorb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.jabsorb.org/mailman/listinfo/jabsorb-dev
