Last week our new baby came, so I'll be behind for awhile!

I finished the changes, but was in the process of merging the changes for
the trunk too--
I'll check in and cut a build as soon as I can get some free time!

On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Arthur Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Michael Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> Arthur Blake wrote:
>> > On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Michael Clark
>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     Arthur Blake wrote:
>> >     > Any comments on this, or shall I just check it in?
>> >     > I was thinking about checking it in for 1.3 branch (creating one
>> if
>> >     > necessary) and the trunk both...
>> >
>> >     It looks good to me. I wouldn't bother with a branch for 1.3 -
>> >     this is a
>> >     bug fix, the code change is small and all the tests pass.
>> >
>> >
>> > I think a branch *is* necessary since the trunk has changed quite a
>> > lot since 1.3... otherwise how else would I do it?
>> > I don't want to modify the 1.3 tag directly!
>> > (would not we always do it this way after the main release has been
>> > done, no matter how trivial the change??)
>> >
>>
>> The branch is there already:
>>
>>  http://svn.jabsorb.org/svn/jabsorb/branches/1.3/
>>
>> We just need to backport the patch onto that branch and commit against
>> the branch then make a tag for the release.
>>
>> The normal source code control practices is to make a branch before for
>> a major release exactly so we have a place to position to place these
>> minor maintenance bug fixes. We have so far been following these
>> practices (the branch was created at 1.3 release time by William).
>>
>> After this minor patch releases is committed, we make a tag off of that
>> branch. e.g.
>>
>> svn copy https://svn.jabsorb.org/svn/jabsorb/branches/1.3/ \
>>  https://svn.jabsorb.org/svn/jabsorb/tags/1.3.1/
>>
>> e.g. branch for major releases, tags for minor releases.
>>
>
> Ah good.  I wasn't aware that was done.
> I should have looked first ;)
> Thanks.
>
_______________________________________________
Jabsorb-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.jabsorb.org/mailman/listinfo/jabsorb-dev

Reply via email to