Yes, but AccessManager is jackrabbit-dependent, no? i.e. is not part of the spec.
Thanks. On 10/13/05, Stefan Guggisberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/13/05, Martin Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi. > > > > I have to implement a security layer over my jackrabbit based > repository. > > I'm confused about how could be done. What's the purpose of the > > checkPermission session's method ? Yes, it's clear that you can check > > permissions, but how can those permissions can be set on jackrabbit? > > > > Is actually using an AccessManager the only way to implement node-access > > security under jackrabbit? > > well that's exactly the idea of the AccessManager interface. by > implementing > AccessManager you can provide your own access control mechanism. > > cheers > stefan > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Martin > > > > >
