On 10/13/05, Martin Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, but AccessManager is jackrabbit-dependent, no? i.e. is not part of the > spec.
correct. access control management has been intentionally left out in version 1.0 of the spec. version 2.0 (jsr 283, http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=283) will address access control management as well as other areas that have been omitted in version 1.0. cheers stefan > > Thanks. > > On 10/13/05, Stefan Guggisberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 10/13/05, Martin Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > > > I have to implement a security layer over my jackrabbit based > > repository. > > > I'm confused about how could be done. What's the purpose of the > > > checkPermission session's method ? Yes, it's clear that you can check > > > permissions, but how can those permissions can be set on jackrabbit? > > > > > > Is actually using an AccessManager the only way to implement node-access > > > security under jackrabbit? > > > > well that's exactly the idea of the AccessManager interface. by > > implementing > > AccessManager you can provide your own access control mechanism. > > > > cheers > > stefan > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Martin > > > > > > > > > >
