Hi
I'm trying to use jackrabbit in a cluster scenario. Since jdbc calls are rather expensive caching results is a common practice, but as you all pointed PMs are not designed to be smart. So, do you think caching should be in the PM?, it should be somewhere else?, it shouldn't be at all? any more option?
I'm thinking of a cluster scenario with jdbc PM + distributed cache + jackrabbit instead of any PM + jackrabbit + rmi server + rmi client
I prefer the first config because there are products that build the cache on each server and don't pass the cached objects around the cluster.
It seems I often feel tempted to bad practices :(, so I'd like to know your opinion before taking a decision.
thanks in advance edgar
