On 6/8/05, Bertrand LEGA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > I must be doing something very bad with my node type declaration, > because I still have the problem. > I add a test program to highlight my problem : a simple java class with > a msdos batch launcher. > > Please add all the necessary jar files in the lib folder, ie the following : > . commons-collections-3.0.jar > . commons-logging-1.0.jar > . concurrent-1.3.4.jar > . cqfs-3.5.6.jar > . cqfs-jackrabbit-3.5.6.jar > . geronimo-spec-jta-1.0-M1.jar > . jcr-0.16.4.1.jar > . log4j-1.2.8.jar > . lucene-1.4.3.jar > . xercesImpl-2.6.2.jar > . xmlParserAPIs-2.0.2.jar > . and jackrabbit of course ! > > The node type layout is very simple : one type testNode. > testNode, nt:base > + property : name, String > + property : state, String, mandatory, autocreated, default value > (draft) > + property : alwaysDisplayed, boolean, mandatory, autocreated, > default value (false) > > When I create a new node of type testNode, the two autocreated > properties are not present, and thus I cannot save my node because > they're mandatory. The test program shows all that. > > Maybe some part of the node type definition (located under > content-repository\data\repository\nodetypes) is not correct, but it > used to work.
could you please send me your custom_nodetypes.xml? thanks stefan > > If you have any insight, please let me know :) > > Cheers, > Bertrand. > > > Tobias Strasser wrote: > > >nothing should have changed. your example works fine for me in the > >current revision. > >cheers, tobi > > > >On 6/7/05, Bertrand LEGA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>Hello, > >> > >> > >>I'm moving my project to JCR 0.16.4.1 (ri-1.0 rev 180460 - 6/6/2005). > >>I'm under the impression that the default values don't work as expected > >>or changed in the newer version of Jackrabbit. > >> > >>I'm declaring a node type with a string property (autocreated=true + > >>default value=foo). The problem is that I don't have the property > >>created and initialized with 'foo' when I create a new node of that type. > >> > >>Is there any changes in the specs that prevent this from working ? > >> > >> > >>Bertrand. > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
