yes I will check-in the compact node type parser into contribs ASAP.
On 11/23/05, Tobias Bocanegra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and where did the namespace declaration go ?
> we had this:
>
> cnd ::= { ns_decl | node_type_def };
> ns_decl ::= '<' prefix '=' uri '>';
> node_type_def ::= ....see document....
>
> for example:
>
> <nt='http://www.jcp.org/jcr/nt/1.0'>
> [nt:unstructured]
> - *
> + *
>
> (extending nt:base was implizit for non-mixin types)
>
>
> On 11/23/05, David Nuescheler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hi jukka,
> >
> > looks great. sorry for the delay.
> >
> > with respect to the "compact node type definition"
> > i just quickly made peeters draft available here:
> > http://www.day.com/o.file/Compact%20Node%20Type%20Definition.doc?get=c4a27b78b1e464a44f7f63e34aeb9f3c
> >
> > i think that it would be interesting to have some code that
> > converts nodetype definitions to and from the "compact" notation.
> >
> > [peeter, didn't you start to do something like that at one point?
> > did that already make it into some experimental contrib? ]
> >
> > regards,
> > david
> >
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------< [EMAIL PROTECTED] >---
> Tobias Bocanegra, Day Management AG, Barfuesserplatz 6, CH - 4001 Basel
> T +41 61 226 98 98, F +41 61 226 98 97
> -----------------------------------------------< http://www.day.com >---
>
