Hi, On 1/4/06, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On the other hand, I am not sure, whether the AdapterFactory itself is > the right place for this kind of thing. Maybe this should be > "outsourced" into some kind of IteratorFactory.
You're probably right. The RemoteAdapterFactory interface is getting quite crowded nowadays, so perhaps we should introduce some more tightly scoped factory interfaces to make the package more easily configurable. Though I kind of like the facade nature of the RemoteAdapterFactory interface. BR, Jukka Zitting -- Yukatan - http://yukatan.fi/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software craftmanship, JCR consulting, and Java development
