Hi Brian, On 1/10/06, Brian Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > anybody have any other suggestions?
Based on your description it feels to me that you are seriously pushing the limits of the TextFilter feature. Have you considered the alternative of doing the binary-to-index-optimized-text conversion at the application level and storing the results as an extra string (or a text/plain binary) property? This would probably double your storage requirements, but you'd avoid the mentioned problems and there would be no need to use Jackrabbit-specific features. BR, Jukka Zitting -- Yukatan - http://yukatan.fi/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software craftmanship, JCR consulting, and Java development