On 1/11/06, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Based on your description it feels to me that you are seriously > pushing the limits of the TextFilter feature. Have you considered the > alternative of doing the binary-to-index-optimized-text conversion at > the application level and storing the results as an extra string (or a > text/plain binary) property? This would probably double your storage > requirements, but you'd avoid the mentioned problems and there would > be no need to use Jackrabbit-specific features.
we did consider that option, but it turns out that querying against a single jcr property isn't good enough (for various reasons that aren't interesting here). also, doubling my current storage requirements of just below 500gb, to nearly a terabyte of storage for a 10,000 user calendar server with a 15mb user quota, just seems outrageous and, i'm pretty sure, unacceptable to those holding the checkbook ;)
