On 3/16/06, Angela Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi jeremi > > jeremi joslin wrote: > > I will start it maybe this week end. > > > Why you don't want to had this functionnalities to the simple webdav > > server? We will not broke anything, and maybe ... > > i don't have anything against having the simple server > being deltaV enabled :)) the reason for only having > webdav 1,2 compliance lever was that up to now i had no > need for additional stuff and nobody asked for it... > that's it. > > > ... if you want we can > > disable each extensions on the configuration file. > > what would be the usecase for having the configuration? > a server being deltaV enabled can happily deal with a > level1,2 client, can't it? yes sure, it's just if someone don't want to allow users to turn on versionning but it can be done by the right management I think.
Do you think it's possible to use some code from the JCRServerServlet? > > > I will work first on the document versioning > > (http://www.webdav.org/deltav/), and after the right management > > (http://www.webdav.org/acl/). > > oh. regarding rfc 3744... there is a jira issue for this > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-350, since the dav > library is currently missing support for 3744. > i have to admit, that i'm already done with issue JCR-350 > (at least in an initial version), but i didn't commit it yet, > because it would have made it hard to separate the changes that > go into 1.0 from new stuff :)). like now 1.0 is in another branch, can you commit it? Jérémi -- Blog: http://www.jeremi.info LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1437724 Project Manager XWiki: http://www.xwiki.org skype: jeremi23 -- msn et gtalk : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
