I have no objection on releasing 2.16 👍🏼, but would you consider merging the JsonIgnoreProperties fix[1] if the PR changes still seems reasonable? 😆
[1] https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/pull/4070 2023년 9월 30일 (토) 오전 2:14, Tatu Saloranta <t...@fasterxml.com>님이 작성: > So: it has been a while since 2.15.0 was released, in late April 2023, > 5 months ago. > The intent was to follow up fairly quickly with 2.16 -- and for that > to happen, it's time to release the first (and ideally, only -- we > don't seem to get tons of feedback from RCs) release candidate soon. > > As per > > https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson/wiki/Jackson-Release-2.16 > > we already have over 70 changes (fixes, additions). And this is > probably missing Kotlin/Scala module changes. > So 2.16 will be a non-trivial release. > > But. Before cutting the RC1 I wanted to see how we are doing with > original goals to handle: > > 1. Completing addition of essential Processing Limits (add max read > doc size; max read property-name length; writer-side max nesting) > 2. Add support for Canonical JSON (in some form, no formal spec seems to > existt) > 3. Property Introspection rewrite (my long-term Number #1 absolute > must-have) > > and so far: > > 1. Processing limits: Fully implemented! > 2. Canonical JSON: some aspects implemented > (JsonNodeFeature.WRITE_PROPERTIES_SORTED) but not everything; not sure > what'd be the best approach -- in particular, number formatting open > issue > 3. Property Introspection rewrite: not done, not even started (sigh) > > Given timing, I think 1 out of 3 will have to do; I don't see a > realistic change of getting (2) and (3) completed. > > But aside from this, there is one Feature (or set of smaller pieces) > that I do want to get in 2.16: `JsonNode.withArray()/withObject()` > regression/change handling (databind issues #3780, #4095, #4096). > Once this is tackled, I'd be fine closing set of features to get in 2.16. > > If anyone feels there are other "Must Have" features -- and ones that > in-flight, i.e. may be completed within next, say, 2 weeks -- please > LMK ASAP and those can be considered as well. > > How does this sound? Opinions, suggestions, other feedback? > > -+ Tatu +- > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jackson-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to jackson-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jackson-dev/CAL4a10jnoguz-A7fbCNq1eWK8S0RGDUmTqHe3Q2W%2BUO0qY885w%40mail.gmail.com > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jackson-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jackson-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jackson-dev/CALS-ipyKkw%3DQ%3Dz5FSn89NhtAj1rs8QmAZ7X%2B%3D%2BHwo31BXO7zng%40mail.gmail.com.
