On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 8:49 PM Joo Hyuk Kim <beansk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I have no objection on releasing 2.16 👍🏼, but would you consider merging the > JsonIgnoreProperties fix[1] if the PR changes still seems reasonable? 😆 > > [1] https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/pull/4070
Duly noted, thanks! Somehow wasn't on my radar, now is. -+ Tatu +- > > 2023년 9월 30일 (토) 오전 2:14, Tatu Saloranta <t...@fasterxml.com>님이 작성: >> >> So: it has been a while since 2.15.0 was released, in late April 2023, >> 5 months ago. >> The intent was to follow up fairly quickly with 2.16 -- and for that >> to happen, it's time to release the first (and ideally, only -- we >> don't seem to get tons of feedback from RCs) release candidate soon. >> >> As per >> >> https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson/wiki/Jackson-Release-2.16 >> >> we already have over 70 changes (fixes, additions). And this is >> probably missing Kotlin/Scala module changes. >> So 2.16 will be a non-trivial release. >> >> But. Before cutting the RC1 I wanted to see how we are doing with >> original goals to handle: >> >> 1. Completing addition of essential Processing Limits (add max read >> doc size; max read property-name length; writer-side max nesting) >> 2. Add support for Canonical JSON (in some form, no formal spec seems to >> existt) >> 3. Property Introspection rewrite (my long-term Number #1 absolute must-have) >> >> and so far: >> >> 1. Processing limits: Fully implemented! >> 2. Canonical JSON: some aspects implemented >> (JsonNodeFeature.WRITE_PROPERTIES_SORTED) but not everything; not sure >> what'd be the best approach -- in particular, number formatting open >> issue >> 3. Property Introspection rewrite: not done, not even started (sigh) >> >> Given timing, I think 1 out of 3 will have to do; I don't see a >> realistic change of getting (2) and (3) completed. >> >> But aside from this, there is one Feature (or set of smaller pieces) >> that I do want to get in 2.16: `JsonNode.withArray()/withObject()` >> regression/change handling (databind issues #3780, #4095, #4096). >> Once this is tackled, I'd be fine closing set of features to get in 2.16. >> >> If anyone feels there are other "Must Have" features -- and ones that >> in-flight, i.e. may be completed within next, say, 2 weeks -- please >> LMK ASAP and those can be considered as well. >> >> How does this sound? Opinions, suggestions, other feedback? >> >> -+ Tatu +- >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "jackson-dev" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to jackson-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jackson-dev/CAL4a10jnoguz-A7fbCNq1eWK8S0RGDUmTqHe3Q2W%2BUO0qY885w%40mail.gmail.com. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jackson-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to jackson-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jackson-dev/CALS-ipyKkw%3DQ%3Dz5FSn89NhtAj1rs8QmAZ7X%2B%3D%2BHwo31BXO7zng%40mail.gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jackson-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jackson-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jackson-dev/CAL4a10isg1NXGTQHCMm0Efb6g%3D7EHi_BUBV2HqPQ9VBgTF1z_A%40mail.gmail.com.
