jackson-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [jackson-dev] Jackson 2.10 pre-release, 2.10.0.pr1, available Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Jackson 2.10 pre-release, 2.10.0.pr1, available Mark Derricutt
• [jackson-dev] does jackson 2.9.8 support jdk 11? divine chelladurai
  • Re: [jackson-dev] does jackson 2.9.8 support jdk 11? Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] `jackson-databind` 2.9.9.1 micro-patch released for 2 CVEs Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] `jackson-databind` 2.9.9.1 micro-patch released for 2 CVEs Mark Derricutt
  • Re: [jackson-dev] `jackson-databind` 2.9.9.1 micro-patch released for 2 CVEs Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] I (@cowtowncoder) will be on vacation until end of June 2019, slow(er) responses Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Allow customization on how missing properties are deserialized Alexandru Ionita
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Allow customization on how missing properties are deserialized Ruwen Schwedewsky
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Allow customization on how missing properties are deserialized Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] ECMAScript2015 JSON.stringify pretty printer Antoine Toulme
  • Re: [jackson-dev] ECMAScript2015 JSON.stringify pretty printer Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] ECMAScript2015 JSON.stringify pretty printer Antoine Toulme
  • Re: [jackson-dev] ECMAScript2015 JSON.stringify pretty printer Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] JSTEP-1: Jackson 3.x versioning (Maven, Java package) proposal -- feedback requested Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] JSTEP (Jackson STrategic Enhancement Proposal) page: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-future-ideas/wiki/JSTEP Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Proposal for Jackson 3.x improvements to Tree Model (`JsonNode`): https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-future-ideas/wiki/Jackson3-Changes---JsonNode Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Jackson 2.9.8 patch release out (multiple security fixes) Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Proposal for JsonNode improvements for Jackson 3.0 Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Still important: on shared ObjectMapper (3.0), unchecked exceptions for ObjectReader/-Writer Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] SUPER-IMPORTANT: Naming, Naming, Naming! Make Jackson 3.0 better already! Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] SUPER-IMPORTANT: Naming, Naming, Naming! Make Jackson 3.0 better already! 'Michel Krämer' via jackson-dev
  • Re: [jackson-dev] SUPER-IMPORTANT: Naming, Naming, Naming! Make Jackson 3.0 better already! Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] SUPER-IMPORTANT: Naming, Naming, Naming! Make Jackson 3.0 better already! Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] SUPER-IMPORTANT: Naming, Naming, Naming! Make Jackson 3.0 better already! Lovro Pandzic
  • Re: [jackson-dev] SUPER-IMPORTANT: Naming, Naming, Naming! Make Jackson 3.0 better already! Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] SUPER-IMPORTANT: Naming, Naming, Naming! Make Jackson 3.0 better already! Ben Vesco
  • Re: [jackson-dev] SUPER-IMPORTANT: Naming, Naming, Naming! Make Jackson 3.0 better already! 'Michel Krämer' via jackson-dev
• [jackson-dev] Jackson WIP page: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-future-ideas/wiki/Jackson-Work-in-Progress Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Finally created the `jackson-dev-infosec` google group -- moderated Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Jackson 2.9.7 patch release out Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Anyone tried Jackson with Java 11 EA yet? Tatu Saloranta
  • [jackson-dev] Re: Anyone tried Jackson with Java 11 EA yet? Lovro Pandzic
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Re: Anyone tried Jackson with Java 11 EA yet? Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Surprising behaviors about java 8 time serialization and deserialization Kezhu Wang
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Surprising behaviors about java 8 time serialization and deserialization Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Quick question: should there still be 2.10 after 2.9, since 3.0 will take a while? Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Quick question: should there still be 2.10 after 2.9, since 3.0 will take a while? 'Michel Krämer' via jackson-dev
• [jackson-dev] Anyone interested in adding support for `javatuples`? Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] detect if incoming JSON document sets property to `null` or is absent. Garret Wilson
  • Re: [jackson-dev] detect if incoming JSON document sets property to `null` or is absent. Ruwen Schwedewsky
  • Re: [jackson-dev] detect if incoming JSON document sets property to `null` or is absent. Tatu Saloranta
  • [jackson-dev] Re: detect if incoming JSON document sets property to `null` or is absent. Garret Wilson
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Re: detect if incoming JSON document sets property to `null` or is absent. Ruwen Schwedewsky
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Re: detect if incoming JSON document sets property to `null` or is absent. Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Re: detect if incoming JSON document sets property to `null` or is absent. Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Interest in a closed `jackson-security` discussion group? Tatu Saloranta
  • [jackson-dev] Re: Interest in a closed `jackson-security` discussion group? Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] 2.9.5 release being started -- will take a while Tatu Saloranta
  • [jackson-dev] Re: 2.9.5 release being started -- will take a while Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Migrating from JodaTime to Java8 Time Ruwen Schwedewsky
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Migrating from JodaTime to Java8 Time Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Quick note: getting close to making ObjectMapper immutable, built using Builders -- stay tuned Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Non-resolvable parent POM Rob Oxspring
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Non-resolvable parent POM Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] XML vs JSON, Tree Model, support for "infer Arrays from sequence of Elements"? Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Reminder: New Jackson 3.x features, removals, default changes added under `jackson3-dev` Tatu Saloranta
  • [jackson-dev] Re: Reminder: New Jackson 3.x features, removals, default changes added under `jackson3-dev` Lovro Pandzic
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Re: Reminder: New Jackson 3.x features, removals, default changes added under `jackson3-dev` Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Re: Reminder: New Jackson 3.x features, removals, default changes added under `jackson3-dev` Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Improvement idea for "sub-class blacklisting" (CVEs for serialization gadgets) Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Interest in releasing 1.9.14 to address CVE-2017-7525 / CVE-2017-15095 Gareth Smith
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Interest in releasing 1.9.14 to address CVE-2017-7525 / CVE-2017-15095 Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Sources for open json data for testing, benchmarking? Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Deprecating, end-of-life'ing FasterXML wiki Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Re: On handling NaN / +Inf / -Inf wrt java.lang.Double, BigDecimal mhcomputing
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Re: On handling NaN / +Inf / -Inf wrt java.lang.Double, BigDecimal Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Is there a TOML file support? Kant Kodali
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Is there a TOML file support? Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Writing a new Jackson FAQ? Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Jackson 2.9.2 patch version released Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] On Jackson 3 naming; `JsonFactory` -> `StreamFactory` (?); split API, json Impl Tatu Saloranta
  • [jackson-dev] Re: On Jackson 3 naming; `JsonFactory` -> `StreamFactory` (?); split API, json Impl Tatu Saloranta
  • [jackson-dev] Re: On Jackson 3 naming; `JsonFactory` -> `StreamFactory` (?); split API, json Impl Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Issues with contributing Take Weiland
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Issues with contributing Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Issues with contributing Take Weiland
• [jackson-dev] Jackson 3 proposal: remove dataformat auto-detection functionality Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Deserializing different json representations into a one java object chetan choulwar
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Deserializing different json representations into a one java object Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Deserializing different json representations into a one java object chetan choulwar
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Deserializing different json representations into a one java object Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Deserializing different json representations into a one java object chetan choulwar
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Deserializing different json representations into a one java object Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Deserializing different json representations into a one java object chetan choulwar
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Deserializing different json representations into a one java object Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Deserializing different json representations into a one java object chetan choulwar
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Deserializing different json representations into a one java object chetan choulwar
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Deserializing different json representations into a one java object Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Deserializing different json representations into a one java object chetan choulwar
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Deserializing different json representations into a one java object chetan choulwar
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Deserializing different json representations into a one java object chetan choulwar
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Deserializing different json representations into a one java object Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Starting design for Jackson 3.0 changes: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson3-dev Tatu Saloranta
  • [jackson-dev] Re: Starting design for Jackson 3.0 changes: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson3-dev Dejan Stojadinović
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Re: Starting design for Jackson 3.0 changes: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson3-dev Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Kicking off Jackson 3.x work: first steps Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Json document check root element included(generic appraoch) dynamically. Ramesh
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Json document check root element included(generic appraoch) dynamically. Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Jackson 2.9.0 released Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Last call for bug fixes for 2.9.0 -- release by end of this week (and July 2017) Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Moving Smile format specification to github: https://github.com/FasterXML/smile-format-specification Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Unable to do @JsonDeserialize(using=MapDeserializer.class) Matthew Ouyang
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Unable to do @JsonDeserialize(using=MapDeserializer.class) Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Opinions on `jackson-databind` PR #1681 ("can not" -> "cannot" in exception messages) Tatu Saloranta
  • [jackson-dev] Re: Opinions on `jackson-databind` PR #1681 ("can not" -> "cannot" in exception messages) Lovro Pandzic
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Re: Opinions on `jackson-databind` PR #1681 ("can not" -> "cannot" in exception messages) Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Help with Jackson 2.9.0-SNAPSHOT, java.util.Date/Calendar handling testing Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] j.u.s.Stream Serializers and CLOSE_CLOSEABLE Jeff Maxwell
  • Re: [jackson-dev] j.u.s.Stream Serializers and CLOSE_CLOSEABLE Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] j.u.s.Stream Serializers and CLOSE_CLOSEABLE Jeff Maxwell
  • Re: [jackson-dev] j.u.s.Stream Serializers and CLOSE_CLOSEABLE Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Jackson 2.9.0.pr4 -- the last pre-release version of 2.9.0 -- now out Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Some testing for cross-minor-compatibility, Jackson 2.9.0.pr3 Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Proposal: jackson-module-security (better name wanted....) Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Interest in helping with 2.9 Docs (wiki)? Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Please do NOT use Lombok for tests (Immutables, auto-value may be ok) Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Combining CSV, Properties and CSV format git repos -> jackson-dataformats-text Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Bug or wrong usage of Date Deserialiser ? Dam
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Bug or wrong usage of Date Deserialiser ? Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Bug or wrong usage of Date Deserialiser ? Dam
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Bug or wrong usage of Date Deserialiser ? Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Jackson, Java 8 support: serializing Streams? Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Any way to commit a fix to jackson-dataformats-binary/protobuf? Nikolai Riikonen
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Any way to commit a fix to jackson-dataformats-binary/protobuf? Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Any way to commit a fix to jackson-dataformats-binary/protobuf? Nikolai Riikonen
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Any way to commit a fix to jackson-dataformats-binary/protobuf? Nikolai Riikonen
• [jackson-dev] Starting to release Jackson 2.9.0.pr1 -- some issues to solve slow going Tatu Saloranta
  • [jackson-dev] Re: Starting to release Jackson 2.9.0.pr1 -- some issues to solve slow going Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Creating "safe" or "unchecked" ObjectReader, ObjectWriter (for Java 8 streams) Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Starting to collect Jackson 3.x change ideas Tatu Saloranta
  • [jackson-dev] Re: Starting to collect Jackson 3.x change ideas Jeff Maxwell
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Re: Starting to collect Jackson 3.x change ideas Jeff Schnitzer
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Re: Starting to collect Jackson 3.x change ideas Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Re: Starting to collect Jackson 3.x change ideas Jeff Schnitzer
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Re: Starting to collect Jackson 3.x change ideas Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Re: Starting to collect Jackson 3.x change ideas Jeff Schnitzer
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Re: Starting to collect Jackson 3.x change ideas Tom Mack
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Re: Starting to collect Jackson 3.x change ideas Jeff Schnitzer
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Re: Starting to collect Jackson 3.x change ideas Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Re: Starting to collect Jackson 3.x change ideas Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Scala module patches 2.7.9, 2.8.7 now out as well Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] On naming of pre-release candidates: 2.9.0.rc1 vs 2.9.0.pr1 vs 2.9.0.alpha Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Working on improving Jackson Avro module, feedback appreciated Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Dropping support for Scala 2.10: drop from 2.9, or 3.0? Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Jackson-dev Gitter group Lovro Pandzic
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Jackson-dev Gitter group Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Jackson-dev Gitter group Lovro Pandzic
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Jackson-dev Gitter group Jochen Schalanda
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Jackson-dev Gitter group Lovro Pandzic
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Jackson-dev Gitter group Lovro Pandzic
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Jackson-dev Gitter group Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Jackson-dev Gitter group Lovro Pandzic
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Jackson-dev Gitter group Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Jackson-dev Gitter group Lovro Pandzic
• [jackson-dev] Volunteers as additional Jackson Scala module release masters? :) Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Some easy (?) features to implement for YAML backend, if anyone interested Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Starting release process for 2.8.6 soon, then 2.7.9 Tatu Saloranta
  • [jackson-dev] Re: Starting release process for 2.8.6 soon, then 2.7.9 Tatu Saloranta
• Re: [jackson-dev] Objenesis Dragan Jotanovic
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Objenesis Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] On vacation until Jan 4, 2017 Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] On vacation until Jan 4, 2017 Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] getting rid of String.intern Vladimir Dolzhenko
  • [jackson-dev] Re: getting rid of String.intern Vladimir Dolzhenko
  • [jackson-dev] Re: getting rid of String.intern Vladimir Dolzhenko
• [jackson-dev] Jackson 2.8.5 release in progress: dataformats, JAX-RS, Scala still to be completed Tatu Saloranta
  • [jackson-dev] Re: Jackson 2.8.5 release in progress: dataformats, JAX-RS, Scala still to be completed Steve A.
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Re: Jackson 2.8.5 release in progress: dataformats, JAX-RS, Scala still to be completed Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Getting ready for 2.8.5 release -- any concerns, fixes in progress? Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Quick note: unifying Java8 modules under new repo Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Initial implementation of "deep merge" (#1399): potential issues, feedback? Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] On naming: `InputMismatchException`, `JsonInputMismatchException` or `JacksonInputMismatchException`? Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Behavior of CBOR, int32: expose as `long` always, or as-needed? Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Re: JAX-RS baseline -> 2.0? Николай Гриценко
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Re: JAX-RS baseline -> 2.0? Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Re: JAX-RS baseline -> 2.0? Николай Гриценко
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Re: JAX-RS baseline -> 2.0? Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Re: JAX-RS baseline -> 2.0? Dmitry Spikhalskiy
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Re: JAX-RS baseline -> 2.0? Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Project suggeston: jackson-bom Christopher Currie
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Project suggeston: jackson-bom Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Project suggeston: jackson-bom Christopher Currie
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Project suggeston: jackson-bom Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Project suggeston: jackson-bom Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Project suggeston: jackson-bom Christopher Currie
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Project suggeston: jackson-bom Jochen Schalanda
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Project suggeston: jackson-bom Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Project suggeston: jackson-bom Christopher Currie
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Project suggeston: jackson-bom Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Project suggeston: jackson-bom Christopher Currie
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Project suggeston: jackson-bom Tatu Saloranta
• [jackson-dev] Evolving thoughts on Java baseline: Jackson 2.9 still with Java 7; 3.0 with Java 8? Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Evolving thoughts on Java baseline: Jackson 2.9 still with Java 7; 3.0 with Java 8? Christopher Currie
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Evolving thoughts on Java baseline: Jackson 2.9 still with Java 7; 3.0 with Java 8? Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Evolving thoughts on Java baseline: Jackson 2.9 still with Java 7; 3.0 with Java 8? Christopher Currie
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Evolving thoughts on Java baseline: Jackson 2.9 still with Java 7; 3.0 with Java 8? Tatu Saloranta
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Evolving thoughts on Java baseline: Jackson 2.9 still with Java 7; 3.0 with Java 8? Lovro Pandzic
  • Re: [jackson-dev] Evolving thoughts on Java baseline: Jackson 2.9 still with Java 7; 3.0 with Java 8? Tatu Saloranta

• Earlier messages
• Later messages