Hello,
I hope my question will not be another "why doesn't Jackson find
polymorphic type for my Map values (or List or Set)" and I hope I did my
best to check for any question/answer :).
I have a bean with an any field:
@JsonAnyGetter
@JsonAnySetter
protected Map<String, Object> properties = new HashMap<>();
When initializing the map with:
properties.put("foo", new FooBean());
properties.put("foos", List.of(new FooBean()));
properties.put("long", 123);
properties.put("longs", List.of(123));
properties.put("longss", List.of(List.of(123)));
I want to produce:
{
"foo": {
"@class": "org.FooBean", "foo": "bar"
},
"foos": [
{
"@class": "org.FooBean", "foo": "bar"
}
],
"long": 123,
"longs": [123, 567],
"longss": [[123], 567]
}
ie. a type for bean but not for primitive or collection/map.
Is this use case achievable by using jackson? To quote that post
<https://groups.google.com/g/jackson-user/c/aHHmeZW37Es/m/yhPhZBbmBwAJ> *if
there'd be an option that says, if there is a type attribute at the
beginning, create this type, rather than a natural one. *
Thanks for your help
Nicolas
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jackson-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jackson-user/f62bae35-a14e-4f9f-b152-6bfcf2e83873n%40googlegroups.com.
