Well, maybe I'm not so silly. I was thrown off by a checkin. Here is an example of what I believe is 0% branch on a class with no branch logic.
<https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-nGIY0b2XlzU/VDWeb_118SI/AAAAAAAAA1c/GkC3zk3Dyc4/s1600/Screen%2BShot%2B2014-10-08%2Bat%2B3.19.05%2BPM.png> On Tuesday, October 7, 2014 5:06:51 PM UTC-5, Jeremy Brown wrote: > > OK, Really this is just me being silly. The hashCode and equals methods > certainly have branch logic. > > Thanks, Jeremy > > On Tuesday, October 7, 2014 4:17:33 PM UTC-5, Marc R. Hoffmann wrote: >> >> Can you please provide a specific example demonstrating the problem? >> >> Regards, >> -marc >> >> On 07.10.14 16:23, Jeremy Brown wrote: >> >> I'm getting 0% branch coverage on code with no branch logic. It's a >> package that just contains JPA classes and Spring Controller Templates >> which is very well tested using BoneCP and H2. If there are no branches to >> execute shouldn't the coverage be 100%? Maybe this seems like a quibble but >> these kinds of issues make our teams very hesitant to display code coverage >> information to the org, it's hard enough to get them to accept it already. >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "JaCoCo and EclEmma Users" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JaCoCo and EclEmma Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
