Hi Jeremy,
the native JaCoCo report would show "N/A" instead of 0% if there are no
branches at all.
Your screen shot is the Jenkins plug-in which is not maintained by us. I
recommend filing a bug at the respective project:
https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/JaCoCo+Plugin
Regards,
-marc
On 08.10.14 22:28, Jeremy Brown wrote:
Well, maybe I'm not so silly. I was thrown off by a checkin. Here is
an example of what I believe is 0% branch on a class with no branch
logic.
<https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-nGIY0b2XlzU/VDWeb_118SI/AAAAAAAAA1c/GkC3zk3Dyc4/s1600/Screen%2BShot%2B2014-10-08%2Bat%2B3.19.05%2BPM.png>
On Tuesday, October 7, 2014 5:06:51 PM UTC-5, Jeremy Brown wrote:
OK, Really this is just me being silly. The hashCode and equals
methods certainly have branch logic.
Thanks, Jeremy
On Tuesday, October 7, 2014 4:17:33 PM UTC-5, Marc R. Hoffmann wrote:
Can you please provide a specific example demonstrating the
problem?
Regards,
-marc
On 07.10.14 16:23, Jeremy Brown wrote:
I'm getting 0% branch coverage on code with no branch logic.
It's a package that just contains JPA classes and Spring
Controller Templates which is very well tested using BoneCP
and H2. If there are no branches to execute shouldn't the
coverage be 100%? Maybe this seems like a quibble but these
kinds of issues make our teams very hesitant to display code
coverage information to the org, it's hard enough to get them
to accept it already.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "JaCoCo and EclEmma Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
it, send an email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
<https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JaCoCo
and EclEmma Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
