Hi Michael, First of all - thank you for this information.
Given that yours number of tests is different from number of tests reported in this thread by Stephan, I strongly believe that there is no strong correlation with number of tests per se. With total amount of data to be processed (classes and their coverage) - maybe, but not with exact number of tests in arbitrary test suite. Stephan, I guess that you're also using Windows? If so and if this is something related to Windows, then this complicates attempts to reproduce on our side, because me and Marc (active developers of EclEmma and JaCoCo) are daily users of Linux and Mac OS X, but not Windows. Since you, guys, able to stably reproduce this, then why not give us a hand and investigate this bug using the same principles and tools (debugger, maybe network analyzer such as Wireshark, etc) as any other similar bug in software that you develop? All code of EclEmma and JaCoCo is open and freely available. This will greatly speedup resolution of this problem. And we'll really appreciate such contribution. Regards, Evgeny -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JaCoCo and EclEmma Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jacoco/510b0b70-24d3-4589-891c-21d3277238e2%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
