On 27.05.20 15:46, Nikhil Devshatwar wrote:
> 
> 
> On 27/05/20 7:01 pm, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 27.05.20 14:23, [email protected] wrote:
>>> From: Nikhil Devshatwar <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> PCI kernel framework requires that all the instances in the
>>> device tree either specify the PCIe domain or none does.
>>>
>>> Currently, Jailhouse dynamic overlay describes the PCI domain
>>> which causes problems because root cell DTS does not describe
>>> this.
>>>
>>> Fix this by not specifying the domain in root cell config.
>>> Also, fix the size of the PCI target region to match with the
>>> correct description in TRM.
>>>
>>
>> Please rather patch your DTs to use the domain ID (upstream). This here
>> means that you will get a new domain ID on every Jailhouse start.
> 
> +Kishon,
> 
> Can you please let me know why are we not using hard coded domains for
> PCIe device for J721e?

Something like this:

https://github.com/siemens/linux/commit/764a3a5da899b596474edf916b44dfc034443445
https://github.com/siemens/linux/commit/1f916502347d2b902002b430cffe18b11685f211

Honestly, I was too lazy so far to push that upstream as well.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jailhouse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jailhouse-dev/d1a436df-e7c0-5718-6ef9-92424263a035%40siemens.com.

Reply via email to