Re: PROPOSAL: datamodel package

[robert burrell donkin]

On Friday, July 27, 2001, at 12:05 AM, Daniel Rall wrote:

> "Michael Gerdau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Now with knowing there is something like torque I'm not too eager to
>> continue "my" (i.e. Nick's and my :) work. In fact I'd only want that
>> if I'd get the impression torque does have "unfixeable deficiencies"
>> which for the time being I don't think it does.
>
> I for one am very happy to hear this--I hope it means that you'll be
> looking at Torque and Texen and making recommendations (or submitting
> patches ;) on how they can be improved.

my question is whether the datamodel proposal would help or hinder this 
process. it would be a positive benefit if this project could be used to 
develop and evaluate material of which the best ideas could then be fed 
back into torque and texen. on the other hand, if it distracts attention 
and development away from those tools, it would obviously be a bad idea.

- robert