>>> Now with knowing there is something like torque I'm not too eager to
>>> continue "my" (i.e. Nick's and my :) work. In fact I'd only want that
>>> if I'd get the impression torque does have "unfixeable deficiencies"
>>> which for the time being I don't think it does.
>>
>> I for one am very happy to hear this--I hope it means that you'll be
>> looking at Torque and Texen and making recommendations (or submitting
>> patches ;) on how they can be improved.
>
>my question is whether the datamodel proposal would help or hinder this
>process. it would be a positive benefit if this project could be used to
>develop and evaluate material of which the best ideas could then be fed
>back into torque and texen. on the other hand, if it distracts attention
>and development away from those tools, it would obviously be a bad idea.
...and that's certainly not my intention.
Give me some time (a week or two) to finish a current deadline. Meanwhile
I'll try to get started with texen/torque/velocity so that at least I'm
able to correctly use the words ;-)
Once I know better what I'm talking about and of course see what's already
there I will try to replace the existing xsl scripts (the ones in the
proposal aren't up to date anymore :). This should function as a first
"template programming lesson" and I'd be happy to share the results and
get pointed out poor use of concepts etc.
After that I should be up to speed to discuss matters with more "substance".
Best,
Michael
--
Vote against SPAM - see http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/
Michael Gerdau email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windows Ice Cream -- Hoggin' DOS
PGP-keys available on request or at public keyserver
