"Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > string keyed properties
> 
> As I'm integrating the sources you submitted ("diff" files are a lot more
> useful for this than complete replacements, by the way), it struck me that
> we might want to call these "mapped" properties rather than "string
> keyed" properties.  Besides being shorter to type, it also creates the
> correct idea that the bean implementor is probably doing some sort of Map
> implementation underneath.
> 
> What do you think?

Good idea.

--
gR

Reply via email to