"Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > string keyed properties
>
> As I'm integrating the sources you submitted ("diff" files are a lot more
> useful for this than complete replacements, by the way), it struck me that
> we might want to call these "mapped" properties rather than "string
> keyed" properties. Besides being shorter to type, it also creates the
> correct idea that the bean implementor is probably doing some sort of Map
> implementation underneath.
>
> What do you think?
Good idea.
--
gR
- Re: ActionForms With Dynamic Properties Gregor Rayman
- Re: ActionForms With Dynamic Properties Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: ActionForms With Dynamic Properti... Gregor Rayman
- Re: ActionForms With Dynamic Pro... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: ActionForms With Dynamic... Gregor Rayman
- Re: ActionForms With Dynamic... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: ActionForms With Dynamic... Gregor Rayman
- Re: ActionForms With Dynamic... Incze Lajos
- Re[2]: ActionForms With Dyna... Oleg V Alexeev
- Re: ActionForms With Dynamic Pro... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: ActionForms With Dynamic... Gregor Rayman
- Re: ActionForms With Dynamic Properties Jan Sorensen
