Good point.  That sounds reasonable to me.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Vincent Massol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Morgan Delagrange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: [httpclient] refactoring httpclient


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Morgan Delagrange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Vincent Massol"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 10:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [httpclient] refactoring httpclient
>
>
> > Hi Vincent,
> >
> > It's likely that Slide is using GUMP or some other automated building
tool
> > on a nightly basis, so in deference to them, it's probably best to merge
> the
> > branch AFTER the Slide patches are prepared.
> >
>
> Agreed. However I understood Remy said that Slide was not using
> commons-httpclient anymore and was relying on it's own version. My idea
was
> :
> * have a single main trunk for commons-httpclient
> * work together towards a solution that would please everyone
> * provide patches for Slide to work with this
> * move Slide from its own httpclient to commons-httpclient
>
> > - Morgan
>
> -Vincent


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Reply via email to