> What we need is a real release of the code from a month ago + bugfixes. > No logging, no extra dependencies, no API changes (add methods only if needed) > Then if we need a new API, we can then design one and then a smooth transition, > being backwards compatible for at least a couple of months. > Also a commitment that there will be support on the first release. I think this is fair, and this is my intention for the 0.9 release. I hope you can help me support it :) > > Patching slide doesn't solve anything, there are users out there that use > HttpClient (Slide version) already. Of course you can volentier to patch my > swing client (200 workdays) and a cocoon2 based web version as well... Fair enough, but that didn't stop Slide from changing out from under me ;-) That is what I am trying to help prevent from happening again. Scott
- [httpclient] refactoring httpclient Rodney Waldhoff
- Re: [httpclient] refactoring httpclient Vincent Massol
- Re: [httpclient] refactoring httpclient Morgan Delagrange
- Re: [httpclient] refactoring httpclient Vincent Massol
- Re: [httpclient] refactoring httpclient Morgan Delagrange
- Re: [httpclient] refactoring httpclient Remy Maucherat
- Re: [httpclient] refactoring httpclient Scott Sanders
- Re: [httpclient] refactoring httpclient Remy Maucherat
- Re: [httpclient] refactoring httpclient Scott Sanders
- Re: [httpclient] refactoring httpclient Dirk Verbeeck
- Re: [httpclient] refactoring httpclient Scott Sanders
- Re: [httpclient] refactoring httpclient Rodney Waldhoff
- Re: [httpclient] refactoring httpclient Remy Maucherat
- [httpclient][VOTE] going forward Vincent Massol
- Re: [httpclient][VOTE] going forward Peter Donald
- Re: [httpclient][VOTE] going forwa... Vincent Massol
- Re: [httpclient][VOTE] going f... Remy Maucherat
- Re: [httpclient][VOTE] goi... Vincent Massol
- Re: [httpclient][VOTE] goi... Remy Maucherat
- Re: [httpclient][VOTE] going forward Remy Maucherat
- Re: [httpclient][VOTE] going forwa... Remy Maucherat
