> Good summary, it seems pretty accurate to me.
>
> My preferences would be, in order, C and A. C provides a smoother upgrade
> path by making bug fixes etc. to the main branch more accessible, but A
> insures that nobody downloads the wrong JAR. I'm not a big fan of B, and
I
> recognize the difficulties of D.
>
> I think nearly everyone who has looked at the refactored interface prefers
> it, so it seems like not releasing the refactored code (option B) is not
> doing service to the users. If we pick C, I'd like to specify that the
1.x
> and 2.x versions are both maintained, but that the 1.x branch is more
> specifically oriented toward Slide compatilibity.
I would agree with C too if the "no new features" rule isn't interpreted too
strictly. It is quite obvious that the plan is not to introduce
groundbreaking changes, since our goal is to maintain API compatibility in
the 1.x branch.
Remy
