----- Original Message -----
From: "Morgan Delagrange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 8:40 PM
Subject: Re: [HttpClient] An overview of the different alternatives
> Good summary, it seems pretty accurate to me.
>
> My preferences would be, in order, C and A. C provides a smoother upgrade
> path by making bug fixes etc. to the main branch more accessible, but A
> insures that nobody downloads the wrong JAR. I'm not a big fan of B, and
I
> recognize the difficulties of D.
>
> I think nearly everyone who has looked at the refactored interface prefers
> it, so it seems like not releasing the refactored code (option B) is not
> doing service to the users. If we pick C, I'd like to specify that the
1.x
> and 2.x versions are both maintained, but that the 1.x branch is more
> specifically oriented toward Slide compatilibity.
>
same here. C and then A in that order.
> - Morgan
-Vincent
