> I'd like to submit an implementation of HttpURLConnection. Question: in > which branch ? I think it is best *not* to put in 1.1 as it is a new feature > and we want a 1.0 released ASAP. However it could be put in 1.1 or in 2.0 or > both. I'd say both if possible, since that's basic functionality that some people would expect to be provided in a HTTP client (I just didn't need it, so I didn't do it). Of course, if time is an issue (it probably is), then you can do it only for 2.x. Remy
- [VOTE] [httpclient] Release Plan for HTTP Client 1.0 Rodney Waldhoff
- Re: [VOTE] [httpclient] Release Plan for HTTP C... Morgan Delagrange
- Re: [VOTE] [httpclient] Release Plan for HTTP C... Dirk Verbeeck
- Re: [VOTE] [httpclient] Release Plan for HTTP C... Alex Fern�ndez
- Re: [VOTE] [httpclient] Release Plan for HTTP C... Remy Maucherat
- Re: [VOTE] [httpclient] Release Plan for HTTP C... Vincent Massol
- Re: [VOTE] [httpclient] Release Plan for HTTP C... Vincent Massol
- [httpclient] HttpURLConnection implementation, ... Vincent Massol
- Re: [httpclient] HttpURLConnection implemen... Vincent Massol
- RE: [VOTE] [httpclient] Release Plan for HT... Remy Maucherat
- RE: [VOTE] [httpclient] Release Plan for HTTP C... Sanders
- [PATCH] digester namespace bug fix robert burrell donkin
- (Digester) Namespace logic robert burrell donkin
- Re: (Digester) Namespace logic Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: (Digester) Namespace logic robert burrell donkin
- Re: (Digester) Namespace logic Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: (Digester) Namespace l... robert burrell donkin
